The only thing worse than a diet that delivers minimal results is the freely available surgical procedures for weight reduction, some which diminish the body's ability to absorb nutrition to the point that supplements must be taken for the rest of a lifetime. There is HARD data as to the complications from the surgical procedures, just conjecture as to any possible long term effects of hCG.
There's something VERY WRONG with a government that allows radio commercials for bariatric surgery, but opposes a program that has worked since the 1950's.
Eat right, exercise, expend more calories with physical exertion than you take in. In a perfect world that'd work for everyone. For someone 300 lbs plus who can barely get off the couch, thighs raw from rubbing together and joint pain - jumping on the treadmill does not look very inviting.
Take that same person after losing 30-40 lbs, joint pain & hypertension greatly reduced, getting a little self confidence and 'tude - and they might actually WANT to jump on, power walk, take up weight training.
Bad info cuts both ways it seems, just as some gloss over the bad, a few have negative comments with little common sense. Recently someone using a $50 scale that displays body fat % came to the conclusion that they'd lost structural fat. One heck of a scale that it can decipher exactly WHERE the muscle loss came from. On the other hand, I've seen a few dozen hydro & body scan results that - well, made their conclusion seem as if it were based on a $50 scale. The test results fom the medical facilities were very constant, less than 2% of the weight loss was muscle mass.
I don't view the protocol as a quick fix -more of a springboard to get those to the point where they are apt to be more active.
Current statistics report 30+ % of Americans are obese and an additional 30+ % are just overweight,
studies projecting upwards of 90% of Americans being overweight or obese by the year 2030 with per annum expense to treat weight related issues estimated at close to a trillion dollars.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/
080728192936.htm
Interesting - that a plastic surgery text book written in the 80's lists the hcg protocol as a "safe, reliable technique for the treatment of obesity". Plastic surgeons -suggesting maybe before you go throwing someone on an operating table - try this.
http://books.google.com/books?id=Tydte5aJTW0C&pg=PA276&
dq=Advances+in+aesthetic+plastic+surgery+1987&
ei=RCZXSZuLLJWckATNvdSAAg#PPP15,M1
The hard to find double blind medical study that suggest people on hCG lost nearly twice as much as placebo.
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/reprint/26/2/211
Currently there are 3 - count 'em THREE pharma companies with diet pills in clinical trials.. Arena, Vivus, Orexigen. For the good of mankind ? Doubtful.
They interviewed a gent who lost 50 lbs in a year using one of the new drugs... wow, 50 lbs in a year. I just had a morbidly obese woman report she'd
lost 51 lbs in a single month on the hCG protocol. (THAT blew even me away, but as a reference she was over 400 lbs when she started)
With obesity at epidemic proportions they're hoping to cash in - it's estimated that in the next few years health expenses related to weight loss prescriptions will balloon from 500 mil to over 2 BILLION dollars.
Do I suggest the protocol as a first diet ? NO. With less than 50 lbs to lose I'd much rather them try a workout program such as Body for Life.
Do I think the protocol is a cure ? ABSOLUTELY NOT.
Does it work for everyone? NO
Do I suggest anyone start the protocol without running it by their primary care physician ? NOT A CHANCE.
Are there health risks ? YES - and it burns me to no end the number of sites/books that wrecklessly claim otherwise. Most notably gall bladder issues from lack of fat in the diet, gout attack from a build up of uric acid, in extremely sensitive women possible inflammation of the ovaries. Less notable side effects include loss of energy, possible hair loss, hot flashes, rashes.
I'll tell you this - after having 3 friends decide on surgeries which were total disasters... I've had 5 people thus far tell me they'd lost 60 lbs or more each in four months and that surgery was no longer an option for them. Someone who HAD a gastric bypass and minimal results tell me the protocol has been more successful than they'd ever thought possible.
The protocol for a casual dieter ? No. For someone who's failed multiple diets and is thinking about surgery, serious health issues due to morbid obesity ? YES
Purchased in quantity, the expense of the protocol for a month, and an expected weight loss of 20 lbs or more - $30. Lose as much weight as the mainstream programs - Jenny, Nutri - for less than the cost of a week of their disgusting prepackaged meals... and in 1/4th the time it takes to lose the same amount of weight on their programs.
Unlike the mainstream programs and their high priced celebs - their results that
AREN'T typical, and weren't even achieved on their current programs... to date 99% of the people I've worked with have lost a minimum of 25 lbs in 30 days.
There are very few risks to the protocol, and with a very small percentage experiencing any of the more serious side effects. It should be discussed rationally with a physician, and the risks weighed against current weight related health risks.
Another point - the FTC sued Simeons Mgt in the 70's, and Trudeau more recently - and the government has YET to make a claim that the protocol is unsafe or ineffective.
I'd submit that while apparently most doctors don't consider their 3000% profit margins lowering their patient's quality of life (they should, it does) the 1000 plus (and ever growing list of) physicians prescribing hCG for weight loss are not violating their most sacred of oaths - "do no harm".