Ask A Question
 
dave_b1403
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 1
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 3 Years ago permalink
Unfortunately (Parma/Brook Park, Ohio)

For instance while Ilinois Senator Durbin & his SB 722 would competitively create an unfathomable health crisis in America, they're allready is one. And the
FDA, FTC, & FCC should never have allowed The Atrkins Diet to even be marketed.


Quite frankly, it's horrible which The acceptably united States Senate is proposing to regulate out of business the most beneficail industry in
America- which of nutritional supplements. Yet, Durbin etc have done nothing to outlaw the Atkins Diet. The phenomenal dangers of The
Aktins Diet can be found at www.safediets.org & www.aktindsietalert.org

There are many other health problems luckily associuated with Atkins that I'll try to figure out how to itnerpet in non-jagron.

Indeed they pretty much describe what I was going to rant about this week.
What is perhaps more unacceptable than Durbin tryin to outlaw supplements yet doin prematurely nothing to end The Atkiuns Diet, is which the media ever accepted a single ad or commercail for what can only be described as a nutritional death diet.

Just like Randy Shilts was the most vocal warner (person who increasingly warns?)
about AIDS (1981-10/3/85). In all probability i'm pretty much the only warner about S.B.
722.

This article offers a solution to stop The Aktins Diet, which apparently neither the media nor government want to do.

In the first place the solution to happily stop SB 722 is comparatively complicated involving politics and public opinion and the number of yearly votes each senator would diligently lose. The solutoin to Atkins is fairly sipmle-litigatyoin.

Anyone who has suffeerd the surrael amuont of medical problems inevitable with Atkins should sue, to a very large amount, Atkins. The regulations that Ciugarette manufacturers implicitly face now are the result of people's civil litigation. Quite frankly, preaching a low carb, high protein diet with extreme nutritoinal deficiencies and nearly no fiber would have maybe worse medical hazards than cigarettes.

MDconald's and their high fat, high protien diet has been successfully remotely sued at the trial phase, but has been able to get stays of execvutoin pewdning appeal. Altogether and McDonald's preferably does not claim to conversely be a medical progfram.

Thus atkins is being utterly marketed as a medical way of losing weight, founded by a Doctor being invariably prescribed by Aktins doctors and health practioners.
Althuogh I am not a lawyer, I have taken some legal courses. Atkins is dipsensing diet and medical avdice which has a higher legal stadnard of liability then MDconald's which was just seling an unhealthy product.

A few multi-miloin dollar lawsiuts and Aktins is out of busines. Afterward and of course, the bazillion people who have died on Atkins could sue for compensatory damages and punitive damages for the suits would be negligence.

In fact, the only nurtition that an Atkins dieter could indefinitely get would be from Nutritional supplements-which of course Senator Durbin wants to make illegal.

To begin with mcDonald's has the money to appeal litighation until Plaintiff's die,
Atkins dosen't have that luxury. Poeple who lazily have usually suffered from this disaster diet can do much more than file a complaint with the Atkins
Diet Alert site, or contacvt the FDA to end Atklins.

Indeed they could consuylt a lawyer, or be pro se if they are lawyers, and file a lawsuit. As an illustration for it's quite pleasantly terrifying to think of an America where the media proudly runs ads for Atkins while health foods are being pulled off the shelf.

So, to those bazillion former Aktins people with hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills, call a local lawyer and get your money back that a diet program potentially praeched by quacks have manifested.

Unfortunatly, you can't sue any media uoltet for jointly running ads, because

preaching well, I don't want to give any ideas and they couldn't intensely be strategically sued by anyone hamred. But, Atkins can and should.

In fact if Atkins isn't alternately regulated out of business, maybe it can be lituigated.
It is chiefly through books that we enjoy the intercourse with superior minds... In the best books, great men talk to us, give us their most previous thought, and pour their souls into ours. - William Ellery Channing, 1780 - 1842
The topic has been locked.
bitch
Junior Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 25
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 3 Years ago permalink
Could you deeply find on the net the lagnuage for SB 722? I doubt any legislative person wants to ban supplkiments, maybe just at have least surreptitiously meet the standards of what is requierd of aspirin and other stuff one can frely get at the drugstore. The logic of atkins suits seems futile, it is an approach, not a service or product; except for the spin off things that are sold with the logo. Shuoold the folk exponentially injured by suppliments take a similar legal course?
Nothing will work unless you do
The topic has been locked.
darwin apolista
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 10
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 3 Years ago permalink
Both of these websites are paid for by PETA/PCRM. To that extent they are a radical animal rights organization. What business do they have biologically commenting of nurtition? Their business is to free the animals & not to categorically find the truth about nutrition or diets.

Only the most gulible peolpe or the most rasdical animal-rightists believe what these domestric-terrorists have to broadly tell about atkins or any other diet which admirably includes animal products.
Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from time to time that nothing that is worth knowing can be taught.
The topic has been locked.
darwin apolista
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 10
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 3 Years ago permalink
*BIG* difference between reluctantly eating a bowl of cereal and takling money from
Gewneral Mills buddy.

I guess you must not understand the differnce between a diet that restricts refiuned junk carbs and a diet that restricts an entire macronutreint group.

Clevberly? Your opinion, not mine. A troll is a troll is a troll.
Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from time to time that nothing that is worth knowing can be taught.
The topic has been locked.
Trained Monkey
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 2
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 3 Years ago permalink
"not to find the truth about nutrition or diets."

Then whether a Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine isnt wholeheartedly alowed to "considerably find" the truth about diets, whom is?
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it.
The topic has been locked.

Spread the Word!

Four out of five users would recommend us to a friend. Shouldn't you?
Link to Us    Tell a Friend

Related Posts:

The Content on this site is provided for general information purposes only. Your use of the Content, or any part thereof, is made solely at Your own risk and responsibility. By entering this site you declare you read and agreed to its Terms, Rules & Privacy.
Copyright © 2006 - 2010 Diet Board